York Minster, Wolsey's Cathedral
as Archbishop of York
|
And let us
remember too that Henry was far more complex a character than a lust driven
maniac who abandoned his wife in favor of a woman who seduced him in order to
make herself queen. Henry was in a
genuine dilemma. England had been torn
by dynastic struggles and had only enjoyed peace under the Tudors for about
forty years. With no son to succeed him,
the wars could break out again. There
were several scions of the Plantagenet house who had far stronger and more
legitimate claims to the throne than he.
His father, Henry VII, had been King only because he defeated the
usurper Richard III (who himself had seized the throne by murdering his
nephews, the “Princes in the Tower) who held rightful claim. Lean and hungry Plantagenets were just
waiting for some sign of Tudor weakness—and a woman, Henry’s daughter Mary,
inheriting the throne was just such a sign—to plunge England back into civil
war.
Henry had been a
good king. He built on his father’s
successes (and thrift) to fashion a modern nation-state out of the quagmire of
feudal holdings that had been medieval England.
Granted England was not as strong—yet—as France or Portugal, much less
Spain, the greatest world power of the day, but Henry was the laying the
foundation of an Empire that would two centuries later become the greatest
empire of its day. Henry built up the
navy his father had begun. He summoned
Parliament and sought its counsel, making both the nobility and the commons
feel that they held a stake in this new nation.
He built up a strong central government, ennobling capable men with land,
titles, and income to serve as a governmental bureaucracy that extended royal
control over every aspect of English life.
He used his judiciary to make sure that justice reached down to the
lowest in the land as well as upwards to the greatest. All were under the King’s protection and all
were under his law. The one aspect of
English life that Henry could not seem to get beneath his control was the
Church. It wasn’t fair. Ferdinand and Isabella ruled the Church in
Spain. In France, the king had the
Church firmly within his grasp. But
Henry felt that he had no way to make the English Church subject to his
will. When the Church refused him his
demands that it annul his marriage to Queen Katherine—it only proved his point
that there were two sovereigns in England: himself and the Pope. And Henry, devout Catholic as he was, would
have no one share his power.
Now among Henry’s
faults was, as I had pointed out in an earlier posting, his tendency to leave
the day-to-day ruling of his realm to very capable administrators, to his Lord
Chancellors. The greatest of the Lord
Chancellors was Thomas Wolsey, Cardinal Archbishop of York. Wolsey was a powerful man. He not only was the King’s chief minister, he
was papal legate in England. That is to
say that he held sufficient power in England to rule the Church in the Pope’s
name. As long as Wolsey was his chief
minister, Henry could get what he wanted out of the Church. But when Henry wanted an annulment of his
marriage to Queen Katherine—well, that was beyond Wolsey’s jurisdiction and he
could not get that for the king. In the
crunch, when he really needed control over the Church, Henry could not grasp
it. He was not King in England—the Pope
held all the cards. And Henry was not
one to let that situation last.
No comments:
Post a Comment