Selby Abbey in Yorkshire: when
the Benedictine Community was
suppressed, the Abbey Church
became the parish church
|
Although most of the 15,000 religious
in England went along with the royal supremacy and took the required oath that
they recognized Henry as head of the Church, the King determined to suppress
religious life in his realm. It seems
above all to have been a matter of finance rather than theology or even politics—the
king saw the religious houses as a new source of revenue to expand his royal
programmes without having to request the Commons for new taxes. He had learned from Wolsey’s suppressions
that there were vast amounts of wealth—primarily in land—to be gained by closing
down the monasteries. Henry’s agent in
the work was Thomas Cromwell. You might
want to look at the posting for October 14th to learn more about
Cromwell, but Cromwell was in the employ of Cardinal Wolsey and learned well
from Wolsey on how to please the King at any cost and without conscience. When Wolsey fell, Cromwell rose to
power. It was Cromwell who designed
most of the legislation by which Henry separated the English Church from the
Roman Communion. And it was Cromwell who
moved to suppress the monasteries.
With the first suppressions
in 1536 it appeared that this was simply the sort of reorganization that Wolsey
had employed and for which even good Catholics had been calling in order to
reform the Church. Small houses with
little income and few members were first to be targeted. Monks and nuns were transferred to larger
houses that could support them. Royal
Commissioners would visit the house, interview the community, inventory the
assets and make a report back to Cromwell.
Not all houses were immediately suppressed—some were allowed for the
time being to continue. Those marked for
suppression were visited a second time where the visitators would actually
close down the house, transfer the religious, and dispose of the property. In the disposal of the properties—the seizure
of the assets in the King’s name or their distribution to the King’s
friends—the commissioners were very careful to make sure all debts were first
settled, those owned a pension given their rights, and matters settled amiably
with tenants. Properties were not just
seize outright for the King. Those
religious—a minority—who wanted to secularize rather than transfer to a new
foundation—were also given a cash settlement from the monastery assets. As fair as the royal commissioners were, the
canons of the two houses that resisted their suppression—were treated quite
brutally, some with imprisonment and others with death. All of these
foundations closed in the first wave of suppressions were either monks
(Benedictine, Cistercian, or Carthusian), nuns of the same orders, or Canons
Regular. About eighty houses were
suppressed in this first wave—most having less than a half dozen
religious. The Carthusian houses were
larger communities but due to the resistance their now martyred colleagues had
shown to the royal supremacy, came into particular focus for suppression.
The second phase—in 1537—was
accomplished by encouraging larger communities to voluntarily surrender their
property and assets to the crown. The
Cistercians at Furness Abbey voluntarily surrendered their monastery because Henry
was about to move against them for their involvement in the Pilgrimage of
Grace—a popular uprising against Henry’s break with Rome. Jervaulx, also Cistercian, surrendered for
similar reason. Lewes Priory
(Benedictine), Titchfield Abbey (Premonstratensian) Bardsey Abbey (Augustinian),
Eye Priory and Easby Abbey all voluntarily surrendered. A new policy was put into practice with the
religious not being allowed to transfer to other houses, but being given a
modest pension on which to live on their own.
Monastic pensions averaged around £5 a year—at that time the income of a modest
gentleman. Nuns were less fortunate as
their monasteries were usually less well endowed than those of the monks or
canons and received about £3
per annum. Henry required that monks and nuns, though no
longer living in their cloisters, maintain religious garb and he forbad them a
release from celibacy which prevented their marriage. For nuns this mean they usually had to return
to their families, but the pension due them provided them with the ability to
contribute to the family income. Abbots
and priors usually received more handsome—and often more handsome by
far—pensions. They also were more likely
to be offered Cathedral deaneries or even bishoprics, in which case their new position
paid them a salary in lieu of any pension.
Cromwell set up the Court of
Augmentations to make sure that the disposal of monastic property was done in
such a way as not to leave debtors, tenants, or the religious themselves in
undue distress. This was a very wise
policy as the sudden collapse of these houses without providing for the
religious or their employees or their creditors would have done serious
economic damage that would have made the King and his policies very unpopular.
As it was, with people able to get their hands on monastic wealth through royal
grant or purchase, the dissolution was well received in most circles. Indeed, when Mary came to the throne and
investigated the possibility that such properties would be returned to the re-founded
monasteries there was great alarm.
By 1538 many of the larger
monasteries, seeing where the wind was blowing, were applying for permission to
hand over their properties to the Crown in return for pensions. Also
by 1538 Cromwell had gotten the dissolution process down to a science and was
closing down religious foundations quite quickly and with his usual efficiency.
To this point we have spoken
of the monks and canons—both of whom had massive endowments. The mendicant orders—the Augustinian Hermits,
Dominicans, Franciscans, and Carmelites—did not have extensive endowments but
lived from their work and from alms.
Their convents were also closed down but the religious—not having the
assets from which to provide pensions—were not pensioned off. Their buildings were sold or given to clients
of the King in return for services done the Crown. This created some hardship for the
friars. The priests could seek work as
secular clergy—and many having degrees in theology were often rewarded with
decent posts—but the lay brothers had no choice but to enter the workforce as
common laborers. Like the monks and
nuns, the friars—clergy and lay—were not release from the obligations of
celibacy.
Thus by 1539 most—but not
all—of the religious foundations of England and Wales had been suppressed. Only a few great abbeys remained. Vast
amounts of land were in new hands and huge amounts of wealth were in the royal
treasury. At the same time, Henry was
not releasing the religious from their vows and especially from celibacy. England was in many ways still very Catholic
but the elimination of the religious removed one very important bulwark of
religious orthodoxy and in time that would tell.
No comments:
Post a Comment