I was listening to NPR as I did some
errands this morning and there was a very interesting program about the problem
that women with an internet presence—bloggers mostly—have in dealing with
sexist and sexually harassing responses.
I didn’t have the opportunity to hear the entire program as I was in and
out of the various places I had to be, but this is obviously a real problem for
any number of women on the internet.
Being a man—and identified as such on my blog—I have had no such
problem. But what I found interesting
was the sort of remarks that were directed to women. “Lesbian!”
“Baby-killer,” “feminist
bitch.” There were others of a more
generic sort: “bitch” (of course), “whore” and others of that ilk. But what I found captured my interest was
those first three that I quoted (they were not necessarily the first three
mentioned by the commentator).
“Lesbian,” “Baby-killer,” and “feminist bitch” would all indicate the
harassers to be coming from a right-wing perspective. And I must admit that I am not surprised. In my trolling various right-wing blogs (it
is cheaper—and more effective—than taking medicine for low blood pressure) this
is often the sort of anger-language I find used and encouraged.
You might remember that some weeks back,
Duck Dynasty patriarch Phil Robertson
raised some ire by his anti-gay remark in a GQ interview and as a result was
temporarily suspended by A&E from the popular (?)“reality” show. I don’t watch Duck Dynasty—or A&E for that matter—and I didn’t have much of
an opinion on Robertson’s comments or supension. But I was a bit caught off guard when our old
friend Michael Voris came to Uncle Phil’s defense and took a shot at the
bishops for not doing the same. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1g_hPBtC18) But this is precisely what I am writing
about: why do these crazies keep pushing hate-speech? Well, actually I guess that is what crazies
do, or not all crazies—there are nice eccentric crazies—just the evil
ones. And speaking of losing one’s moral
compass—how can Michael Voris hold up Phil Robertson as a moral paragon? Sure Phil talks about Jesus but talkin’ aint’
what’s goin’ to get you into heaven. If
you will bear with me quoting the Huffington Post, we can look at some other
things Uncle Phil says:
The 2009 footage,
which was posted
on Youtube, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDhCxER2fqM&feature=youtu.be
shows the 67-year-old reality TV star speaking at a
Christian retreat in Georgia. During the speech, he tells a story about
advising a young man to find a good Christian girl and marry her.
“Make sure that she can cook a meal. You need to eat some
meals that she cooks, check that out. Make sure she carries her Bible. That’ll
save you a lot of trouble down the road," Robertson said.
He then went on to say that men should wed girls who are
young.“They got to where they're getting hard to find, mainly because these
boys are waiting ‘til they get to be about 20 years old before they marry 'em,”
Robertson said. “Look, you wait ‘til they get to be 20 years old the only
picking that’s going to take place is your pocket. You got to marry these girls
when they are about 15 or 16. They’ll pick your ducks."
Robertson also had some comments on Blacks in the old
South
“I never, with my eyes, saw the
mistreatment of any black person. Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The
blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I’m with the blacks,
because we’re white trash. We’re going across the field.... They’re singing and
happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, ‘I tell you what:
These doggone white people’—not a word!... Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you
say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the
blues,” Robertson said.
Now
I am willing to believe him when he says that he never saw the mistreatment of
any black person. I don’t think he is an evil man and have no reason to think
he would countenance evil—but while I will give the benefit of doubt for
conscience, I won’t credit him for consciousness. Whether it is blacks or gays or women I think
ol’ Phil just lives in the bubbled world of the old South. He has no reason to come out of it. He is not uneducated—he actually has a
Master’s Degree in Education. But once
out of school, he has chosen a path through life where he has not had to
exercise his intellect. He belongs to a
Church that doesn’t challenge him to think.
He has pursued a career that has been successful and lucrative but which
requires no philosophical/theological/critical thinking. He is surrounded by people whose lives and
ways of thinking are no more broad than his.
The world of his mammy and his pappy and of their mammies and pappies is
the only world he knows, needs to know, or wants to know. It works for him and God bless him.
But
I am sorry Michael Voris, it doesn’t work for us Catholics. And you should know better. That static cosmology of an unchanging world
is not what you learned at Notre Dame and it is not what you learned at the
Angelicum—or whatever American campus it was that granted you your cute little Sacrae Theologiae Baccalaureatus (Bachelors in Sacred Theology) in its
Angelicum wrapper. But I am not surprised to find on a Voris video or the blogs that push them, encouragement of that sort of hate speech of
which the women bloggers were bringing to public attention on the radio. This is the problem. Michael and his winged monkeys might think that
they are more Catholic than the rest of us, but there is nothing Catholic about
them. Catholics may be conservative,
but they we are not anti-intellectual. There is nothing in our Tradition that
would justify our rationalizing the sort of bigoted, racist, and sexist ideas represented
by Mr. Robertson. Our theology of marriage may see its
sacramental nature in the union of man and a woman as representative of the
Union between Christ and his Church, it does not see marriage as requiring a
teen-age slave-bride to pluck your ducks—no euphemism intended. Shame on you Michael Voris for being an
apostle of ignorance and bigotry.
No comments:
Post a Comment