I hope I get this posted today, December 12, although I am
starting a bit late. It is just an
observation the priest made at Mass this morning about the apparition of the
Virgin of Guadalupe. According to the story, the Mother of God (call me old
fashioned but I still prefer the designation given at the Councils of Ephesus
and Chalcedon) appeared on December 9 1531 to an Aztec convert to Catholicism,
Juan Diego Cuauhtlatoatzin, as he passed
by the Hill of Tepeyac on the outskirts of Mexico City and spoke to him in the
native Nahuatl language. Juan Diego
reported the incident to the Archbishop, Fray Juan de Zumárraga
(A Spaniard, of course) who asked for some sign of authenticity. Archbishop de Zumárraga was a wise and
compassionate prelate who had no desire to embarrass the campesino but who also had to guarantee the orthodoxy of any cult
that might arise from the alleged vision.
This was especially troublesome as Mary supposedly appeared not as a
Caucasian but as a Native American and was dressed in Aztec clothing with her
sash tied over her pregnant belly in the manner Aztec women dressed during
pregnancy. The Bishop had his suspicions
because the “apparition” Juan Diego claimed to see resembled the Aztec Goddess
of Fertility, Tonantzin (a name which means “Our Revered Mother). There had been a temple to Tonantzin on the
very site where the apparition occurred until several years before when the
Spanish conquerors of Mexico had destroyed the Temple in an effort to wipe out
the native Aztec religion. The Bishop
needed some sign that this apparition of an Aztec Madonna was authentic and not
an attempt to revive the cult of Tonantzin.
Within the next three days there was a healing miracle but the Virgin
went even further, telling Juan Diego to gather some roses that were blooming
there. The Roses were of a variety found
only in Spain and not in the new world.
They had not been seen growing there before. Moreover they were blooming in December
despite the cold. The Virgin arranged
the flowers in Juan Diego’s tilma
(native cloak made of cactus fibers) and told the Aztec to bring the cloak to
the bishop. When Juan Diego opened the
cloak in the bishop’s presence, the image of the Virgin was imprinted on the
cloak. Even from the beginning the
Church was divided on the question of the vision’s authenticity and modern
historians have questioned the existence of Juan Diego. The sources are scarce and none are
contemporary to the events. But that is
not my point. The image of Our Lady of
Guadalupe is extremely popular not only in Mexico but throughout the
Americas. There are some—including
myself—who would like to see our national patronage changed from the Virgin
Mary under the title of the Immaculate Conception to the Virgin Mary under the
title of Our Lady of Guadalupe. It makes
far more sense precisely because she is American. But what is really curious is to consider how
the krazies would react to the vision if it where to happen today. Mary as a Native American? That raises the whole issue of inculturation
and ending the hegemon of European culture and European style Catholicism for
the Americas. Mary appearing to a person
in the political and socio-economic underclass?
That has repercussions for today as well. Some people scream bloody murder when they
see Christ or his Mother portrayed as Africans or as Orientals. What about Mary—or Jesus—dressed in
contemporary American clothing? How
would that go over for a statue in our church or a stained glass window? The
cult of the Virgin of Guadalupe has always been a popular cult, not associated
with the Traditional Latin Mass but with the music and dance of popular Mexican
culture. In fact, while the Spaniards
had come to Mexico in 1519 by 1531 there were very few convert but within five
years of the vision, almost the entire population had embraced Catholicism,
albeit it in highly indigenous expression.
The tilma of Juan Diego is one
of the great evangelizers in the history of the Church.
Consolamini...you should take the time to watch the celebration of the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe that Papa Francesco celebrated in St Peter's Basilica last Friday. It is available here:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O47ccvLDV2Q
The Mass setting music was the Creole Mass which PF loves. This was such a vibrant and lively celebration. In his homily he identified himself strongly with the Latin American peoples and of course that is his heritage. It was about a 180 degree difference from the other papal liturgies as I have seen in the over a year I have been watching these. It was if he were making a point with this saying "This is who I am. These are MY roots: vibrant, alive, full of energy, almost wild. This is where the Church is so get used to it."