The
following article by a priest of the Newark Archdiocese appeared in Northern
New Jersey Papers Sunday morning and attracted a considerable amount of local
attention—mostly quite favorable. Thanks
to reader Liam MacBride who brought the article to my attention and sent me a
copy.
Mitis Judex
Dominus Jesus |
Opinion: Pope Francis adds more seats around the table
BY ALEXANDER M. SANTORA
Pope Francis adds more seats around the table
On gay inclusion, abortion, pontiff is opening new doors
I WAS LEAVING a
Baptism party at Willie McBride's Irish Pub in Hoboken and as I walked past the
bar to the exit, three women were sitting near the door. One turned and asked
me for a blessing. Feeling like a shaman, I still complied.
I turned to leave
and another woman said, "Can you bless me and my fiancé? We are getting
married soon. Our names are Christina and Beth." So, I placed my hands
over their heads and said, "May the Lord give you health and strength and
many happy years together." I made the sign of the cross and as I turned
to leave, the first woman added, "You made our day."
Later, I recalled
what Pope Francis said in the now-famous America magazine interview: "I
manage to look at individual persons, one at a time, to enter into personal
contact with whomever I have in front of me." Because of his vast pastoral
experience, the pope accepts people as they are. This becomes the starting
point for ministry.
On Tuesday,
Francis announced that women who have had abortions can seek forgiveness in
confession without going to the diocesan bishop. "May priests fulfill this
great task by expressing words of genuine welcome ... to obtain the true and
generous forgiveness of the Father who renews all with his presence," the
pope wrote.
In the past,
Francis said, "This church with which we should be thinking is the home of
all, not a small chapel that can hold only a small group of selected
people." Clearly, his image of church has a large eucharistic table to
signal that with the right disposition, all are welcome.
After 10 years as
a pastor in city teeming with young adults, I find that they don't want
judgmental homilies pointing fingers and labeling people. Instead, they hunger
for help in navigating life through the prism of faith. Hoboken has a higher
percentage of gay people, though there is no gay neighborhood and no gay bars
or establishments, and gay people blend in with everyone else. Even at Mass.
Gay men and lesbians do not want to be labeled as "other." And it
seems to work.
Most parishioners
accept people as they are, and society is more tolerant. And more young adults
see discrimination as an injustice, which puts a real burden on churches and
institutions in the 21st century.
For one, there
needs to be a moratorium on labels. The days of separate Masses for gay people
sponsored by Dignity for Catholics and Integrity for Episcopalians, for
example, are over. Gay people search for hospitable clergy and houses of
worship to get involved. There is no need for special homilies or support
groups.
A turning point
in Pope Francis' papacy was that simple rhetorical line on the airplane,
"Who am I to judge?" No pope in recent memory could match Francis'
ministerial experience meeting the poor and living like them. Francis is the
supreme pastor. And that is why the entrenched hierarchy and Vatican Curia do
not know how to handle him.
Francis is not
guided by tradition, as much as the needs of the people of God without
jettisoning church teaching. The synod at the Vatican last year made headlines
because it included current pastoral dilemmas that keep people away from
church.
The New York
archdiocese, for example, closed and merged a number of churches because it
estimated that 18 percent of Catholics attended Mass on a regular basis. And Francis
has the pulse of why this occurs all over the world.
Many priests,
even many younger ones, think they are living in a pre-Vatican Council church
that dictates the way people are expected to live. Some give boring, didactic
homilies and burden the churchgoers with the problems of those who do not even
go to church. And they offer little help for contemporary Catholics to find
faith in daily life.
Francis wants
people to have a renewed experience of faith. And that means meeting them where
they are and understanding the struggles people face every day. What he will
find in typical parishes is that people who might be considered
"sinners" in the eyes of the church come despite frequent invective
and institutional hostility. That they have persevered is a sign of great
faith, which Francis' papacy makes much more hospitable.
The question for
the parish is how participation will change the local churches. As society
tolerates and legalizes many practices that only 25 years ago would have been
taboo, how can churches muster opposition and use rhetoric that denigrates? As
parents and grandparents support their children and grandchildren, how will the
church turn their backs on them and still expect to be seen as just?
None of these
questions have easy answers. But the October synod and Francis's decisions
after it will be the real test of whether the church expects to be relevant in
the 21st century or still cling to a prejudiced past and diminish expectations.
And, by the way, close more parishes because people simply go elsewhere or
nowhere at all.
Gay people,
divorced and remarried Catholics, and women who had abortions are already at
the eucharistic table. Now it's time for the church to listen to their stories
of faith and hope, which is the talk at any table when a family comes together.
We learn from one
another who we are and what we can become. Francis is a hopeful pope. The local
churches can take his lead to heal and help. And maybe, just maybe, those three
women I met at Willie McBride's will find their way to Our Lady of Grace or
some other church and find that there is a place for them at this huge
eucharistic table.
The Rev.
Alexander M. Santora is the pastor of the Church of Our Lady of Grace & St.
Joseph in Hoboken.
This is an excellent article, and I'm happy to see that the side of sanity can also speak and reach the masses.
ReplyDeleteIn the admittedly oversimplified world of ecclesial politics and arguments, the majority of Catholics trend progressive, but they are underrepresented in the clergy and even more so in the publications and voices of the church. I suspect that part of this is because of the general contentment of the majority. As a rule, those benefitting from the status quo aren't activists for change or anything. The world already operates within the range of comfort for them, and so they remain silent. On the other hand, the neotraditionalist and conservative factions are essentially angry or crestfallen because the world isn't going their way. As a result, they complain about the status quo, are more prone to activism, and thus are over represented in many forums, including the blogosphere and the media.
Furthermore, and perhaps better stated, the progressive opinion is underrepresented because if a liberal doesn't like a development (or usually lack thereof) in the church, s/he simply doesn't follow it as a matter of conscience or otherwise. On the other hand, if a conservative doesn't like a development in the church, they have no recourse but to complain and moan about how the leadership "isn't really catholic" and has gone soft. Thus, discontentment for the progressive tends towards a release outside of the group and in a personal fashion, whereas discontentment for the conservative tends towards raising a battle cry and trying to rally the "true" or "pure" members of the group. In the end, it leads to Gnosticism and exclusivity.