Wednesday, October 14, 2015

THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN!!!

This is how our bishops are trained?  No wonder they're a bunch of dancing monkeys!!!  Back in the days before Vatican II, Cardinal Spellman was notorious for calling on one priest or another to get up at a dinner and sing a song and then, to thank him for his performance, name him a Monsignor.  There is no objection to people having fun and using their talents, but this system is teaching the NACers to be song-and-dance suck-ups to the system and it reinforces the emasculation of the clergy with the scalpel of the Church's smothering institutionalism.  It would be much healthier to see the seminarians trained to mix as adults among adults with the rich benefactors flown over for the annual "Rector's Dinner" than to teach them to perform at the command of the hierarchy for the pleasure of the powerful.   sick, sick, sick--time for change.  Give us priests who are men and not monkeys. 

5 comments:

  1. Ha ha ha! Way to take on those radicals misrepresenting traditionalists who use this to insult the Church. You also might find humour in the blog by Fr D, who uses this video often as humourous jokes about the PNAC.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, well, well. Feigned (?) surprise that NAC is filled with pathetic suck-ups who will become even more pathetic bishops. What amazes me is that these June Taylor dancers weren't dismissed for their obviously disordered sexual orientation, now that it is forbidden to ordain those with such deep-seated tendencies. And by the way, Spellman would have required a bit more "service" before bestowing a fuschia sash on some obliging cleric.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's the school that produced the nitwits DOLAN and DI NARDO who were dumb enough to "sign on" to the arrogant bastard PELL's insulting letter against Pope Francis. I'd love to see the stupid bastards who signed that all dismissed. What a bunch of losers. We'd be so much better off without them. (And every US Bishop who trained at this Girls' Finishing Academy).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. not sure about DiNardo conflicting information from different sources I wonder what Dolan's agenda was he certainly isn't a hard liner most of the time

      Delete
    2. Dolan is first and foremost a careerist. I think that he is upset that other US bishops, O'Malley, Wuerl, and now apparently Cupich, have more influence in Rome. He is also not getting the same fawning press I'm the US he was getting prior to the Conclave. It probably annoys Dolan greatly that he is no longer the "big fish" and has to share.

      Delete