I was very disappointed that Malala Yousafzai didn’t
wind the Nobel Peace Prize. I can’t
think of anyone better to symbolize the victory of Peace over Violence in our
contemporary world. But last week when I
saw Diane Sawyer interviewing a group of Muslim women and heard them say that
Malala should “return to Islam” and express their opinions that non-Muslim
women like Ms. Sawyer are “oppressed” because they don’t live “under God’s
will” but as “beholden to the slavery of their own desires” I saw not only the
danger of radical Islam but the danger of radical religion of any stripe.
Several days ago The
New York Times carried a story of two Rabbis who—for a hefty fee—would
arrange for men to be kidnapped and tortured until they gave their wives a get (a religious bill of divorce,
required by Orthodox interpretation of the Mosaic Law for a woman to be
released from marriage). And again, like
listening to those Muslim women, I cannot but wonder about what religion devolves
into among those who consider themselves “orthodox.” Kidnapping and torture are a legitimate means
to carry out compliance with the Mosaic Law?
And I read a story on the internet a few days ago how Orthodox Jewish
settlers had not only stolen the land from Arab families in the West Bank but
adding insult to injury, defaced their mosque.
And this is done because Jewish extremists make the claim that “God has
given this land” to them. The Name of
God is blasphemed when it is used to justify such atrocities just as it was
blasphemed when Christians used horror stories of child kidnappings and murders
to instigate pogroms against the Jews of Europe.
Extremist Hindus murder Muslims and Christians in
India in the name of religious teachings that would demand religious conformity
to all ethnic Indians. And
Buddhists—despite the clear teachings of the Buddha—massacre Muslims in
Myanmar. No wonder so many in our modern
world just walk away in bewilderment and even disgust from religion all
together.
And sadly there is a Catholic Taliban too that would
impose on all in our country, of whatever religion or of no religion, the
dictates of the Church when it comes to matters of marriage or
reproduction. There are those who would
bind not only the consciences but the freedom of others to rules of conduct
whose only basis for authority are religious teachings.
I am not saying that there are not moral standards
and that Christianity’s moral law is in any way arbitrary. I am only saying that any religion that
compels adherence of unbelievers to its creeds or to its specific moral
precepts is essentially a false way of life.
As Christians we have a mission to convert hearts, not to impose
laws. Winning hearts is a far more
challenging mission than imposing laws, but it is the mission Christ gave to
his Church and the only one we do with his blessing.
No comments:
Post a Comment