The High Altar at Durham Cathedral--one can see
in the Reredos the empty nitches from which
images had been removed at the Reformation and
never restored
|
One center of the dissemination of Lutheran ideas in England
in the reign of King Henry was the White Horse Tavern in Cambridge. Leading theologians of the University met
there to discuss these new ideas coming out of Germany. This is where Thomas Cranmer was first
exposed to the ideas that would lead him to champion the Protestant cause in
the Church of England. Several of the
group—Robert Barnes and Thomas Bilney among others—ended up being burned at the
stake. Others such as John Bale and
Myles Coverdale fled to the continent.
Still others—like Cranmer himself—remained in England, keeping their
Protestant ideals to themselves and enjoying the protection of powerful friends
at court. Coverdale and Bale were not
the only two proto-Protestants to flee to the Continent under Henry. William Tyndale and John Hooper were two
prominent others who fled the realm to investigate further the exciting new
ideas emerging from Germany and later from Geneva. Tyndale was to die a Protestant Martyr under
Charles V in Flanders. Hooper would go
on to become a Bishop under Edward VI; and an important figure in the
Reformation.
While they were abroad these English Protestants made many
friends among continental Reformers and when Edward VI came to the throne and
Protestantism was in the English air, not only did the English Reformers
return, but they brought with them some of the leading continental
figures. The Strasbourg Reformer, Martin
Bucer; Bucer’s sidekick, Paul Fagius; the Polish Biblicist Jan Łaski
(John a Lasco); and the Italian Reformer, Peter Martyr Vermigli were among the
more distinguished Reformers seeking to advance the Protestant cause in
England.
Cranmer welcomed these men to England and sought their
support for the Reform (read: Protestantization) of the English Church, but at
the same time their presence placed him in a bind. The Continental Reformers and their English
disciples were anxious for far more drastic action than Cranmer had laid out in
the 1549 Prayerbook and more radical than the politics of the Court would
allow. By this point, Luther and his
fairly conservative policies had been left in the dust by the more radical
Swiss and Rhineland Reformers. Bucer and
the others were not slow in letting Cranmer know that they were disappointed in
his 1549 Prayer Book and 1550 Ordinal and they pushed him to go further. He would issue a far more drastically
Protestant liturgy in a second Prayer Book in 1552 and at the same time a
revised ordinal, but in the meantime the Archbishop continued to make changes
that stripped the Church of England of its Catholic identity. Stone altars were to be replaced by wooden
communion tables to further clarify that the Reformed Sacrament was not a
Sacrifice. Statutes were taken down and
paintings whitewashed over. In many
places the medieval glass with its scenes of scripture and the lives of the
saints was smashed. The chantry chapels
where masses and prayers for the dead had been offered were destroyed.
A particularly crucial incident happened when John Hooper
was named Bishop of Gloucester in 1550.
Hooper had spent time in Geneva where he had come under the influence of
Zwingli and Bullinger and where church ornaments had been done completely away. Hooper refused consecration as a bishop
because the 1549 Ordinal demanded that he wear a surplice and a cope and he
considered this to be papal superstition—confusing the Aaronic Priesthood of
the Old Law for the Christian ministry instituted by Christ, the only Priest of
the New Law. Unfortunately to decline a
nomination by the King was considered an act against the Crown and Hooper was
called to the Privy Council to explain.
King Edward, a Protestant of the most base bias, was willing to forgo
the point and allow Hooper to be consecrated without the required vestments,
but the Privy Council—following a slower path of Reform—was not. The issue dragged on for over a year
including a debate between Hooper and Nicholas Ridley, Bishop of London,
who—though a convinced Protestant himself—defended the vestments rubric. Hooper finally gave in and—wearing the
required vestments—was consecrated bishop on March 8, 1551. What both Ridley (defending vestments) and
Hooper (attacking vestments) agreed on was that vestments were adiaphora—a thing indifferent. It is amazing that such indifference would
cause such an uproar and cause Hooper to bear imprisonment, but it isn’t the
vestments themselves but what they symbolized that was the problem. Vestments were another sign of a sacrificing
priesthood. The outcome of this debate
was the gradual disappearance of vestments from the rites of the Church of
England. Some bishops and priests wore
simply a black gown when presiding at the liturgy. Others would maintain the rochet (for
bishops) or surplice (for priest and deacons) which were officially required
after 1552. The cope would be seen at
the coronation service and in some cathedrals.
The chasuble was to disappear completely. With the replacement of altars with communion
tables it was clear that the Eucharist was no longer understood to be a
Sacrifice. With the gradual loss of
vestments it was clear that the clergy were no longer priests.
Oh, come on! Henry VIII may have made an act that would be called schismatic in separating himself from Rome and arrogating to himself authority that was the Pope's alone, but he was definitely in a state of heresy in his denial of the Church's teaching on the indissolubility of Holy Matrimony. Therefore, he was a heretic before he added to his sins by an act of schism.
ReplyDeleteYou really do need to read more carefully and perhaps consult a book or two (they can be found in libraries where you can read them for free in case you don’t have any at home) rather than the pious version of history Sister Mary whatever gave you in the sixth grade. Henry never denied the indissolubility of Marriage. He sought an annulment of his marriage to Queen Katherine. When Rome failed to give it in a timely manner, it was granted by the Archbishop of Canterbury to whom the power had been delegated by Parliament after Henry had led England into formal schism. Henry subsequently had his marriages to Anne Boleyn and to Anne of Cleves annulled. He never petitioned for a divorce or denied the indissolubility of marriage. Queen Jane Seymour died a natural death. Katherine Howard was beheaded for treasonous adultery. Katherine Parr survived him. Anne Boleyn was also beheaded but Henry had the marriage annulled to remove their daughter Elizabeth from the succession. Furthermore, while the Catholic Church teaches that a true Sacramental Marriage is indissoluble, disagreement from this doctrine does not constitute heresy. The Greek Church permits divorce and remarriage and yet is in schism and not heresy. Not all doctrines are considered grounds for heresy should one disagree.
ReplyDelete