About a week and a half ago, Monsignor Charles Pope, a priest of the
Washington DC Archdiocese published an article in the National Catholic Register stating his conviction that interest in
the Traditional Latin Mass (the pre-conciliar liturgy) is no longer growing and
advocating a more aggressive evangelism among its devotees to restore the
momentum of expanding the popularity of the old rite. It was a remarkably balanced and well-written
article although Monsignor’s observations are based on “anecdotal evidence” and
not established statistics. One facet of
his observations is that as the number of TLM’s expands, the congregational
base divides so that there are more Masses but those Masses are less and less
crowded. Monsignor Pope suggests that
what is needed to restore momentum is a push for “evangelization.”
Now, to be fair to Monsignor Pope, he is a bit ambiguous about what he
means by evangelization, but I would like to draw our attention to the fact
that evangelization is not a matter of advocating for one form of liturgy or
another, nor is the focus of evangelization advancing the Church. Evangelization is spreading the Gospel (Ευαγγαλιον,
Good News) of the Kingdom of God. The
Church is the agent of the Gospel, not its object, and while some rites might
it express it more lucidly, every celebration of the Liturgy in whatever Rite
is an expression of the Lord’s Paschal Mystery.
All Christians are call to evangelize; it is a responsibility given us
at our Baptisms. But this is not the
focus of this post.
According to Monsignor Pope, despite the availability of the TLM at five
parishes in the Archdiocese the number of Catholics in the Archdiocese of
Washington who attend the Traditional Latin Mass (Extraordinary Form, not the Novus Ordo in Latin) are about one half
of one percent of the Catholics who regularly attend Sunday Mass. This translates to about one thousand people
spread over five sites, or an average of two hundred people per site. The neighboring Diocese of Arlington has a
plethora of parishes that offer the TLM every Sunday but there too many of the
sites draw less than 100 people for a Mass.
Across the country even as new TLM sites are springing up an equal (or even
greater number) are closing down or cutting back for a lack of sufficient
numbers attending.
Monsignor Pope uses the example of a parish where he had often
celebrated the TLM over the past quarter century. When the Mass was first introduced, the
Church was “almost full.” Over the years
the congregation has declined by two-thirds.
What is the reason for this? One
reason—and probably the most significant—is that with more parishes offering
the TLM, people opt for a site closer to home.
A second reason is that just as some people have “graduated” from the
Ordinary Form to the TLM, they go on to graduate school in the Byzantine or
other Eastern Rites; some people are pilgrims and they migrate, never
settling. Still others make peace with
the normative liturgy or find a place where it is celebrated in a way they can
at least tolerate and return to the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite. And some simply lose interest in the
spiritual journey, having sampled the honey from a variety of rocks, and just
don’t go anywhere anymore. But no matter
what the reason, the impetus to return to the preconciliar rite seems to have
lost momentum. There will always be
those who, for one reason or another, choose it but there seems to be little
likelihood of it becoming universal practice once again.
I think a big factor in the popularity (or survival) of the TLM is the
reasons that motivate people toward it.
I hear all this “stuff” about “more reverent” or “a sense of holiness”
but ultimately that is all pretty subjective.
Granted in the exceptional situation where it is a sung Solemn Mass
there is a certain aesthetic beauty to it, but so too is there in a Novus Ordo
Mass that is well done—just look at the papal Mass for Christmas Eve. I know myself that I have some experience of
worshipping with a Cistercian community and find the Liturgy—all very Novus
Ordo—to be exceptionally beautiful and reverent. And as for reverence, despite my liberalism I
have yet to trip across a “clown Mass” or see some sandal-clad nun in wispy
dress “preside” at Mass or any other such silliness. I somewhat think such aberrations are a bit
like the Loch Ness Monster: more a creature of legend than of fact. If I have any criticism of the Novus Ordo it
is that too many priests have fallen into a routine of how they “say Mass” and
show all the enthusiasm of a tired mother at the end of the day folding the
laundry. But then I remember the 11
minute Saturday morning specials of my Tridentine youth and have no illusions
how the TLM is inherently more reverent.
I think people are drawn to the TLM for a number of reasons, not all of
them spiritual. I don’t mean to suggest
an individual who prefers the TLM represents all of these characteristics and
there may be other reasons as well.
1. the TLM
preserves that sense of individualism from the encroachment of a “community” of
unknown (and undesired) strangers. You
don’t have to (and couldn’t if you wanted to) interface with your neighbor at
the TLM
2. The TLM permits
you—if you wish—to pray via pious reverie rather than engage you with the
Liturgy itself. This is related to the
sense of individualism in number 1.
3. The TLM
gives you an escape from the daily world and its pressures, allowing a peaceful
and otherworldly respite for the duration of the Liturgy.
4. The TLM
suspends the cultural tensions of our contemporary world and represents a
retreat into a secure past with fixed answers and well-defined boundaries.
5. The TLM
gives you a sense of intimacy with Christ that excludes others.
6. The TLM marks
you as different and distinct. The sort
of music, the use of Latin, the more formal tone gives you a certain status as
a more cultured individual.
7. The TLM
draws people somewhat like-minded in their social and political views, namely
of a strongly conservative conviction.
8. For the
spiritually restless, the TLM offers something new, foreign even, that creates
an immediate semblance of religious experience.
I don’t
mean to suggest that all people drawn to the TLM have one or more of these
(conscious or unconscious) motivations and do not mean to suggest that there
are not other reasons. But I think the movement
in favor of the Traditional (Pre-Conciliar) Rites is, at best, a sort of niche
Catholicism and I agree with Monsignor Pope that the niche is pretty well
filled.
Hi Consolamini,
ReplyDeleteThank you for weighing in on this debate. While I value the people involved on those societies and such weighing in, unfortunately they carry a bias of having to promote their "product" and if they say anything negative then it would result in a loss right?
So it's good you weigh in as a sane person with a decent outlook and viewpoint (historian, respect for liturgical tradition despite liturgical preference) on this matter.
I'm working on my thoughts for my blog Servimus Unun deum. Probably next week I'll have the post up, though it will be comments off due to certain people that shall not be named who don't appreciate analysis contrary to their views on the Latin Mass
I know this anecdotal, but it's absolutely true. My mother and my mother-in-law were pining for the good ol' Latin Mass, and a church on the other side of Atlanta offered one such Mass. So, in spite of travel issue, they went. And it was all they hoped for and remembered.
ReplyDeleteAs they were leaving, one of the regulars took them aside and said she was glad they came, but if they came again, they should have chapel veils and not wear pants. I guess it was nice that
one time. ;)
well, that is what it is all about--following the krazies' rules about what makes authentic Catholicism
ReplyDelete