Archbishop Lefebvre |
Anti-Semitism is as French as crepes suzette—even more so—as we can see that its roots extend
deep into the history of the Gallican peoples—long before there even was a
France, but as we enter into the modern era the battle lines form and we will
see the development of the connection between Anti-Semitism and the Catholic
“Traditionalist” movement.
The Jews had a particularly rough road in medieval France and
the French Crown played a crucial role in the harassment of the Jews. There
were several episodes in which this harassment peaked into persecution and even
mob violence. The Crusades triggered
several waves of mass murder of Jews.
The French Crown expelled the Jews from their domains in 1182, 1306,
1322, and 1394. Jews were forbidden to
own or hold land, had to wear distinctive clothing, were restricted in where
they could live, and often saw their synagogues destroyed (or converted into
churches) and their sacred books burned.
But as France entered the Enlightenment, many of a philosophically liberal
persuasion began to call for the emancipation of the Jews in the Kingdom of
France. One of the Enlightenment figures who was notorious for his
anti-Semitism, however, was Voltaire. On
the eve of the French Revolution a number of advocates of Reform including the Count
de Mirabeau and the Abbé Grégoire advocated giving the Jews full
citizenship. While the government of
Louis XVI did not accede to this suggestion, there were several municipalities
that enfranchised Jews. As the
Revolution began to unfold, the plight of the Jews became one of the
contentious issues with the advocates of Reform (from constitutional monarchy
through radical revolutionaries) supporting civil rights for the Jews and the
monarchists/reactionaries opposing them.
When the papal territory of Avignon was seized by the revolutionaries
and incorporated into France, the Avignonese Jews were granted full citizenship
in France for their support of the annexation of the formerly papal territory
by France in 1791. Their siding with the
Revolutionary (though still a constitutional monarchy) government in seizing
the papal territories only further alienated the Catholic party from the
Jews. As the Revolution progressed from
Constitutional Monarchy to Republic, the Jews of France embraced the
anti-monarchy positions and were happy to see the Church disestablished. However, they did not support the Jacobins
and the Reign of Terror and when the Cult of Reason proscribed Christian
religious worship, the ban was most often applied to Jewish worship as
well. As the dust of Revolution settled
and Napoleon emerged as Emperor of the French, Jews were guaranteed full and
equal rights in the Empire. They were
freed from the Ghettos wherever the French Army conquered and Judaism was
recognized as an official religion of the Empire along with Catholicism,
Lutheranism, and Calvinism. Napoleon
further convoked an assembly of Jewish representatives from throughout his
empire known as the Grand Sanhedrin to be a sort of Jewish High Council and
represent the interests of the Jewish community to the Empire. This helped draw the line with Jews in
Napoleon’s favor while the Catholics tended to be Royalists who refused to
recognize the legitimacy of the Empire in hopes of a restoration of the French
Bourbons to the Crown. Throughout the
nineteenth century Catholics would continue to support the Bourbon/Monarchist
causes while the Jews would support the various liberal governments that came
intermittently along between restorations of the monarchy and the revival of
the Empire under Louis Napoleon (Napoleon III).
When the 2nd Empire collapsed towards the end of the
Franco Prussian War the monarchists held a majority in the National Assembly but
were divided between the Legitimists who favored the Comte de Chambord,
grandson of Charles X and a semi-absolutist monarchy, and the Orleanists who
favored the Comte de Paris, the grandson of Louis Philippe, and a
constitutional monarchy. Although a
compromise was finally arranged, the monarchist party was unwilling to accept
the terms on which the crown was being offered and what was meant to be a
temporary Republic but ended up lasting almost seventy years was established
under the monarchist Marshal of France with the improbable name of Patrice de
MacMahon. Although MacMahon was a
Legitimist who favored the restoration of a strong monarchy, he took his duties
as President of the Republic seriously and refused to sanction a coup by the
conservatives to take over the Republic.
By the time of MacMahon’s resignation in 1879 the monarchist cause had
lost popular support and the Republic was pretty firmly established.
The Catholic Church in France strongly supported the restoration
of the monarchy; therefore non-Catholics: Protestants, Jews, and Secularists
supported the Republic. Consequently the
Church in France became a strong force for political and social
reactionism. French Catholics felt
somewhat betrayed by Pope Leo XIII’s endorsement of the Republic. The Catholic reactionaries mounted a strong
anti-Semitic campaign and were particularly intent on purging the military of
Jews. This resulted in the infamous
Dreyfus case where a French officer of Jewish blood, Alfred Dreyfus, was framed
and convicted of treason and then imprisoned under appalling conditions before
finally being cleared. Catholicism and
anti-Semitism became deeply linked by their common affiliation to conservative
French politics in the early 20th century.
Following the Dreyfus affair and the anti-Semitism that
surrounded it, a reactionary movement arose called Action Français. Action Français set about undoing any
and all effects of the French Revolution—it was monarchist, anti-democratic,
nationalistic and very, very Catholic.
In fact is was so Catholic that Pius XI condemned the movement in
1926—in other words, Pius saw the movement as using a veneer of Catholic faith
for political and socio-economic objectives that were contrary to Catholic
thought. Pius XII lifted the
excommunications in 1939 when he saw Action
Français as a defense against Marxist-Leninism, but the Holy See never
endorsed the political or sociological objectives of the movement which ran
contrary to the encyclicals of Leo XIII and Pius XI (and subsequently to the
social encyclicals of John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI.)
Despite the relative strength of Action Français in the first half of the 20th century,
monarchism never garnered enough political momentum for there to be serious
consideration of restoring the French monarchy, especially in a somewhat
absolutist form as advocated by the hard-line monarchists. Action
Français faded out after World War II, but its nationalistic, conservative,
anti-immigrant and anti-Semitic fanaticism remained in the hearts of many
French reactionaries.
Among the bearers of the Action
Français heritage was the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. Lefebvre came from a monarchist family in the
North of France. Like others in the
Legitimist tradition they saw the French Revolution and the end of the ancien regime as the collapse of
everything Catholic. They wanted not
only to restore the Bourbons to the Throne of France, but Catholicism as the
State Religion. Lefebvre himself was an
ardent supporter of the Vichy Regime during the Nazi occupation as he saw the
Petain dictatorship as the womb for a reborn Monarchist France. The Archbishop shared in the anti-immigrant,
anti-Jew, anti-Muslim, anti-democratic views of Action Français and later, with the collapse of the movement as a
force in French politics, shifted his political allegiance to Jean-Marie LePen
and his French National Party. Le Pen is
infamous for his anti-Semitism and his skepticism about the Holocaust.
Lefebvre’s own anti-Semitism has colored the Catholic
Traditionalist movement. Many
Traditionalists have insisted on maintaining the older Good Friday Collect for
the Jews, describing them as perfidis
(unbelieving, but often translated perfidious).
This word had been removed from
the Liturgy by John XXIII who literally stopped the Good Friday Service in 1960
and ordered the prayer recited without that word. Benedict XVI insisted that the traditional
collect be altered to avoid the word but his insistence has been ignored by
many in the “Traditionalist” community and certainly by those in Lefebvre’s
Society of Saint Pius X. Among the four
bishops illicitly ordained by Lefebvre, the Englishman Richard Williamson, has
been a notorious Holocaust denier. Contemporary
Traditionalist literature both in France and throughout Western Europe and
North America, the parts of the world where neo-Traditionalism has taken root,
is often laced with anti-Semitism, sometimes subtle, sometimes virulent. The Traditionalist communities in France are
hotbeds of agitation against both Jews and Muslims.
What amazes me is that the Vatican seemed to be completely unaware of Williamson's shameful history of anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial. I was aware of it, and I am just an ordinary Catholic with an Internet connection. I wonder how much of a connection exists between the traditionalists of the SSPX and the members of the post-Vatican II church.
ReplyDeleteOh, they had to be aware of it, but sometime perhaps I will some posts on anti-Semitism and the Curia Romana. The connection between anti-Semitism and actually a bias against any of non-European blood lines, runs strong in the various neo-traditionalist movements. I intend to do some posting on that down the line.
DeleteThis,sounds very interesting, and I'lol be sure to read it. BTW, I love your articles on church history and the development of Anglicanism.
DeleteThese posts are fascinating. I would like it a great deal if you would add a bibliography to these posts. Most readers might not care - and I know it really isn't what bloggers do as a general rule - but I don't think this came together off the top of your head and want to know more. Some of us old guys who live in a University town with access to a great library might want to explore a bit.
ReplyDeletelet me work on it I resist doing footnotes etc. because I am not publishing academic papers but simply trying to give readers something that is both entertaining and informative. papers can be dry as dust as you might know from any conferences you have been to. but a good bibliography, especially on anti-semitism and Catholicism would be interesting
DeleteI completely understand about footnotes, but perhaps something as simple as: "For further reading, see....."
DeleteConsolamini,
ReplyDeleteHave you read of the connections that Ab George Ganswein, Prefect of the Papal Household, has with a European group that supports the restoration of various monarchies in Europe? I read one article about this connection but cannot recall where or the name of the group. I even think has some major ties to a very historian in Italy who is adamantly opposed to the current pope. It makes sense to me that Ganswein would align himself so as his original seminary training was in the SSPX seminary in Switzerland where that movement has its heart. it concerns me that this man is that close to Papa Francesco because of his leanings and his subtle and not so subtle digs at the pope in various interviews. You should check out Ganswein's fan club webpage.....I am not kidding you....it exists. I find him, despite his evident good looks (although aging) and his charming smile, to be just a bit of an ego driven man, the dangerous kind.
No I haven't read on that, but it doesn't surprise me. I am planning a posting on monarchism and neo-traditionalism down the line. Ganswein is a slick character but I wouldn't worry about Pope Francis Francis has a somewhat rare ability not only to see through people but actually to read souls. Who knows, he may be Ganswein's salvation and I mean that literally.
DeleteI wonder if the poster is referring to the International Monarchist League. Check out some,of the wackier blogs out there like Royalcello, Charles Coulombe, Bonald, and Mad Monarchist.
Delete