Rumors are flying around that
when Pope Francis comes to the United States in October he will continue on to
El Salvador where he will canonize Archbishop Oscar Romero, the Archbishop of
San Salvador who was murdered by an
assassin from the American backed Salvadoran military in 1980. The interesting aspects of this canonization
is that Romero has not yet been beatified—the normal preliminary step to
sainthood—and there as yet no approved miracles to testify to his
sainthood.
Romero was born on August 15,
1917 to carpenter Santos Romero and his wife, Guadalupe de Jésus Galdámez in
Ciudad Barrios, El Salvador. He was one
of 8 children. The family does not seem to have particularly devout as the
child was not baptized for 20 months after his birth, yet Oscar himself was
drawn to the churches in town even as a very young child. There were only three years of formal
schooling available to him but he was tutored by a local teacher and at age 13
went off to a high-school seminary. His
father, a practical man, had wanted him to be a carpenter and the boy showed
promise in that trade, but wanted to be a priest. His intelligence was noticed in the seminary
and he was eventually sent to Rome for theological studies and he was ordained
in Rome on April 4, 1942. World War II
was raging at the time and on his way back to El Salvador, Father Romero and
his companion, Father Valladares were imprisoned in Cuba as they were coming
from Italy, then an Axis power. He was
soon repatriated and took up pastoral work in his native region in eastern El
Salvador.
Romero was by nature a
conservative and a pious man. He did
what for the time and place were some innovative things such as establish
Alcoholics Anonymous groups, but by and large he was given to supporting the
traditional devotions and pieties of the Salvadoran peasants.
El Salvador had from the time
of its independence from Spain been controlled by an oligarchy sometimes called
“The Fourteen Families.” (There were, in
fact, more families than fourteen, though they were all inter-related through
marriages and had common interest.)
These were the great landowners of Spanish blood. Their children were sent to Cuba or Mexico or
even to Spain and other European countries for education. They lived on large estates farmed by
peasants of Native American or mixed blood.
After independence their cash crop was indigo from which an expensive
blue dye is produced, but by the latter part of the nineteenth century the
economy had switched to coffee production.
90% of the land was owned by this small number of wealthy families. The Constitution was written to give these
families a majority of seats in the national assembly and they—or their client
families—held the officer positions in the military. The military controlled the government by a
series of dictatorships from 1931 until 1979.
A 1932 peasant rebellion led by Farabundo Martí was brutally suppressed
with the murder of over 40,000 Salvadoran peasants. In 1979 the government of General Carlos
Humberto Romero Mena was overthrown by a conservative but reformist military
junta that realized unless there was some economic and land reform the
situation in El Salvador would be untenable and the country would be vulnerable
to an extreme left-wing (read Marxist) power-grab. The American government under President
Carter, and later President Reagan, supported to the Junta, while Cuba and more
left-wing governments supported the FLMN
(Farabundo Martí Liberation National Front) rebels. This led to a violent civil war. In an attempt to suppress the rebels the
Salvadoran Army, under command of the Junta, was often responsible for
indiscriminate slaughter of civilians, most notably the El Mozote Massacre in
1981.
The teachings of the Catholic
Church regarding a just social order—teachings rooted in the Encyclicals of Leo
XIII, Pius XI, John XXIII, Paul VI and the decrees of the Second Vatican
Council—were a powerful stimulus for the poor of El Salvador to seek social
change and this left priests, nuns, and lay catechists vulnerable to attack by
Junta forces who saw the work of the Church as supporting a more radical social
change than they were prepared to make.
Meanwhile in 1970 Romero had
been named auxiliary to Archbishop Luis Chávez of San Salvador and four years later
given his own diocese of Santiago de Mariá, a poor rural diocese. In 1977 Paul VI named Romero to be Archbishop
of San Salvador in succession to Archbishop Chávez who reached the mandatory
retirement age of 75.
Romero was, as I said, a
pious priest of a more conservative bent.
He was certainly no political activist.
But like many holy people, he did not limit himself to those with whom
he agreed but had friends across the political and theological spectrum. Among his closest friends was the Jesuit Rutilio
Grande. Grande worked among the
peasants, catechizing them and raising their consciousness to understand that
the sort of social dysfunction where wealth in concentrated in the hands of a
few while others lack necessities is contrary to the Gospel and the Kingdom of
God. Rutilio Grande had huge influence
among the peasantry and his message became a threat to the existing social
order. In a famous homily he declared
I am fully
aware that very soon the Bible and the Gospels will not be allowed to cross the
border. All that will reach us will be the covers, since all the pages are
subversive—against sin, it is said. So that if Jesus crosses the border at
Chalatenango, they will not allow him to enter. They would accuse him, the
man-God ... of being an agitator, of being a Jewish foreigner, who confuses the
people with exotic and foreign ideas, anti-democratic ideas, and i.e., against
the minorities. Ideas against God, because this is a clan of Cain’s. Brothers,
they would undoubtedly crucify him again. And they have said so.
On March 12, 1977, Grande and
two lay associates travelling with him were ambushed and killed. Romero heard of the murders and went at once
to the church where the three bodies lay.
After celebrating Mass there, the Archbishop spent hours listening to
the stories of the peasants who had gathered their to mourn. Unable to sleep, he spent the night in prayer
and underwent a deep personal conversion where he realized that the Church, if
it were to be faithful, could not stand silently by while the poor were being
driven ever deeper into the dirt but had to stand with them and for them. He said that as he looked at the body of his
friend, he thought “If they have
killed him for doing what he did, then I too have to walk the same path” The morning after the murders, Archbishop Romero
announced that he, as Archbishop, would attend no government function until the
murders had been investigated. In a
Catholic culture where the presence of the Archbishop gave a legitimacy to the
government, this act of separation was seen as a repudiation of the
government’s moral legitimacy and a severe blow to its credibility. It was an invitation to reject government
authority. The following day Romero
published the following statement
The true
reason for [Grande's] death was his prophetic and pastoral efforts to raise the
consciousness of the people throughout his parish. Father Grande, without
offending and forcing himself upon his flock in the practice of their religion,
was only slowly forming a genuine community of faith, hope and love among them,
he was making them aware of their dignity as individuals, of their basic rights
as words, his was an effort toward comprehensive human development. This
post-Vatican Council ecclesiastical effort is certainly not agreeable to
everyone, because it awakens the consciousness of the people. It is work that
disturbs many; and to end it, it was necessary to liquidate its proponent. In
our case, Father Rutilio Grande.
As if this was not sufficient
aggravation to the government, Archbishop Romero next cancelled all Masses
throughout his Archdiocese, instead summoning the faithful to a single outdoor Mass
in San Salvador. 150 priests and over
100,000 faithful attended.
to be continued
to be continued
Thanks for this. Not only is it helpful with respect to Abp Romero, but my diocese has a number of priests from El Salvador and this helps me to understand the cultural and political background in which they were formed.
ReplyDeleteAs usual the Anglicans are way ahead of you. An image of Archbishop Romero has graced Westminster Abbey for years.
ReplyDeleteActually I am aware of that and have seen the statue of Archbishop Romero in the gallery of contemporary martyrs over the west door of the Abbey. It is somewhat easier to make the list of heavenly companions in the Anglican Church than in the Catholic Church; sometimes that works for us and sometimes against us
ReplyDelete