One of the thousands of Posters that dotted the streets of Rome during the funeral of Pope John Paul II |
This is the weekend that John Paul II will be beatified by Pope Benedict XVI—just six years after his death. The beatification is not without some controversy and, to be honest, I am surprised that it has all come about this fast. For one thing, I had heard over the last several years that Pope Benedict was not anxious to advance the “cause” of his predecessor. In part, I think this was a prudent reservation on the part of the current Pope. The papacy of John Paul will be an extremely complex one to historically evaluate. “It was,” as one BBC commentator replied at the time, “the best of times; it was the worst of times.” John Paul was probably the most significant individual in the collapse of the Soviet Empire, not only demolishing the tyrannical regimes but making Stalin a posthumous laughingstock for his derisive comment “How many divisions does the Pope have?” John Paul had immense popularity—especially with the world’s youth and never passed up an opportunity to reach out to them. Yet one cannot say that he brought them back to the practice of the faith, much less to the moral standards which the Church teaches. He took some remarkable steps with interreligious and ecumenical dialogue. At the same time, since his death there has been some serious rethinking of those very same interreligious and ecumenical advances, not least of all by the current Pope. Probably more seriously, there are questions regarding his handling of the Sex Abuse situation in the Catholic Church—how much did he know and in what ways did his policies hinder justice and leave young people exposed to predators? Too, some observers believe that that he greatly weakened the Church by selecting bishops for their loyalty without sufficient regard to their pastoral skills, prudent judgment, or intellectual ability. Certainly we can see in the United States that we no longer have sufficient numbers of articulate or intellectual leaders among the American Bishops to write the sort of pastoral letters that the Bishops turned out on Just War Theology and Nuclear Weapons or the Economic Morality that the bishops of thirty years ago turned out. Of course good leadership or bad leadership does not reflect on the personal sanctity of the candidate. We have had saintly popes who failed to meet the leadership challenges of their times. But the question remains—in what way the example of Pope John Paul II reflects the extraordinary degree of sanctity and virtue that sainthood represents. He was pious, granted—but piety is not holiness. I am not saying that this beatification is a mistake—only that it will be corrected—if corrected it need be—by time’s passing and history’s critique.
As for the rapidity of the process—note here some medieval canonizations (not beatifications) and see their time line:
Name Year of death Year of Canonization
Anthony of Padua 1231 1232
Francis 1226 1228
Francis 1226 1228
Claire of Assisi 1253 1255
Hugh of Grenoble 1132 1134
Elizabeth of Hungary 1231 1234
Thomas Becket 1170 1173
Galgano Guidotti 1180 1184
Hugh of Cluny 1109 1120
Gilbert of Sempringham1190 1202
Dominic 1221 1234
Bernard of Clairvaux 1153 1174
I am sure there are other “quickies” in addition to these, but it does show that at one time the Church didn’t scruple to move ‘em thru. By the way, I will be in Rome this week and doing some travelling for the next week or two so be patient. I won’t be posting every day but I will be collecting photos and doing some research.
No comments:
Post a Comment