What Ideology Do Rorate Caeli And ISIS Have In Common?

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, caliph
of the restored Islamic Caliphate 

Kamel Daoud wrote a thought-provoking op-ed piece for the New York Times this morning.  It began

IT might have been an occasion for collectors of omens to rejoice: For the first time in nearly five centuries, in 2015 the Prophet Muhammad’s birthday coincided with Jesus’ birthday. A cause for hope? Too little, it turns out.

Mr. Daoud went on to explain Fundamentalist Islam’s hatred of time and obsession with geography.  With the goal of returning to a “pure Islam,” time becomes the enemy because time represents change and change means decay from the pure ideal.  In the same way, Fundamentalist Islam, represented by ISIS, wants to establish control over geographic space in order to be able to erase the changes of time whether by destroying evidence of time and its changes (the ruins of Palmyra) or by creating the “clean slate” on which the Islamist ideology can be imprinted.

After explaining this Islamic fundamentalist dream of re-creating the world in its own mythic image and likeness, Mr. Dauod goes on to compare it with the policies of the various right-wing nationalist movements taking over European politics right now.  He mentions, in particular, France where the National Front is gaining popularity on its anti-immigrant policy.  He claims that it represents a desire for that pure Gallic society where French culture was unchallenged by the arrival of “The Stranger”—the immigrants from France’s former colonies in Africa.

France has a long history of Gallic xenophobia.  Go back 120 years to the Dreyfus Affair where a Jewish military officer was falsely accused of and framed for passing military secrets on to the German Embassy.  What is so disturbing to those of us who are Christian and who know history is the role the Catholic Church played in the anti-Semitism and xenophobia on which the Dreyfus Affair fed.  The goal was to undo the constitutional changes of the French Revolution and restore the unity of throne and altar of the ancien regime. 

There are Americans who share a similar xenophobic dream for our society.  They want an America that is a “Christian Nation” composed of individuals of European stock.  We not only don’t want those Syrian Muslim refugees, we don’t want our little brown brothers from the south swarming over our borders.  Bring back the America of Ozzie and Harriet. 

You see, there are Christians who, like Islamic extremists, want to establish a “pure Christianity” (or in the case of the Katholik Krazies, a “pure Catholicism”).  Like the Islamic nut-cases they view time and change with a gnostic negativity.  Your Westboro Baptist Church folk or your Jerry Falwells and Pat Robertsons erase twenty centuries of tradition in their romantic revival of an imagined “primitive Christianity.”  They ignore twenty centuries of biblical commentary to impose their own isolated meaning on scripture.  They ignore twenty centuries of Christian heroes as examples to guide us in discipleship.  They hold in contempt twenty centuries of liturgical and spiritual tradition in a futile attempt to erase the time between us and Jesus. 

The Katholik Krazies take a somewhat different approach.  They pick an “ideal spot” in the contemporary world—let’s say for example, the reign of Pius XII (1939-1958) and presume that the doctrine, liturgy, and practice of that time had remained unchanged from Jesus and Apostles (their well-touted myth that the Tridentine Mass is “The Mass of the Ages,” just like the Apostles said Mass; their obsession with late 19^th century neo-scholasticism as the sole model of framing the faith; their models of a monarchial Church with all its Burke-like trappings) and that all subsequent development represents only decay.

An authentically Christian approach to time sees time, not negatively as decay, but as the context in which the Kingdom of God is revealed.  Time is the theatre in which God has revealed himself in Christ Jesus—and continues to reveal himself in the life of the Church.  While it may be a bit much for some to see time as marching towards that Omega Point in which all creation is brought together in Christ, our Christian faith tells us that time is oriented towards that moment of parousia when Christ returns.  For Christians time is holy and we celebrate that in our liturgical seasons.  The Katholik Krazies and other fundamentalists are trapped in a gnostic bubble of negativity that ultimately denies the redemption. 

Mr. Douad finishes his op-ed piece by contrasting the Right-Wing western danger and the Islamic fundamentalist threat writing

One might counter that of the two groups, only Muslim extremists kill. Which is true, at least when it comes to people. But the extremists of the right kill humanism, and that’s the only thing that could save us all.

This brings up our subject for next time: Christians and humanism.  

Rogue Religion And the Threat of a Restored Caliphate

The last Ottoman Caliph, 

Abdülmecid II

Mohammed was a genius and one of a handful of people who can be said to have changed the course of history.  The Arabs had been a fractious people whose tendency towards drunkenness and constant inter-tribal warfare had prevented  them from becoming a cohesive nation able to protect themselves from economic and political exploitation by more powerful neighbors whether the Byzantines to the West or the Persians to the East.  Beginning around the year 610 AD when he was about 40 years old, Mohammed allegedly had a series of revelations from the Archangel Gabriel that he compiled into religious text that would eventually become the Qur’an.  Through a combination of persuasion and conquest, Mohammed forged the various Arab tribes into single nation united in a single and aggressive religious faith which he called Islam, or submission (to the Will of God.)  By the time of his death the Arab nations were ready to expand their political power beyond the Arabian peninsula into the Byzantine and Persian Empires. 

 When Mohammed died in 632, however, he had made no provisions for who would succeed him as the leader of the Islamic faithful. There was considerable disagreement among the closest circle of his advisors.  In the end, his father-in-law, Abu Bakr, was named “caliph” or Leader of the Faithful.  This was both a religious and political title as Islam, unlike the modern West which believes that Religion and the State should be in separate and distinct spheres, sees society as in integrated whole with the political power at the service of sharia or religious law. 

Mohammed had several sons but none survived him into adulthood.  There were those among his followers who believed that the succession should have gone to his son-in-law, Ali and they refused to recognize the legitimacy of Abu Bakr’s reign.  Those who accepted the election of Abu Bakr as caliph evolved into the Sunnis.  Those who believe that Mohammed had designated his son-in-law, Ali, as his successor evolved into the Shiites.  This split was not immediate but grew slowly wider during Islam’s first century.

Abu Bakr died only two years after Mohammed.  He was the last caliph for almost three decades to die peacefully.  Abu Bakr was succeeded by Umar ibn al-Khattab who reigned for ten years.  It was Umar who captured Jerusalem from the Byzantines in 636.  Umar was assassinated by agents of the Persians in 644 after a ten year reign.  He was succeeded in turn by Uthman ibn al-Affan.  Umar had appointed a body of six men to elect a successor upon his death and left the instructions that any of the six who dissented from the choice should be killed so that there would be opposition.    The final choice came down to Uthman or Ali and while Uthman was chosen, the Ali faction would not accept the election.  But neither was Ali or any of his followers killed.  A very deep wound within the community of Islam began to fester. 

During Uthman’s caliphate, variant versions of the Qur’an were collected,  a single text established by the caliph, and all other versions destroyed so that there would be a single Arabic text which even today is the definitive text of the Qur’an.  Uthman’s reign was a violent one, marked by rebellions in both Syria and Egypt that threatened the unity of the caliphate.  In fact, the rebels offered the caliphate to Ali but he supposedly refused.  In 656 a group of rebels broke into Uthman’s home and murdered him.  Ali was urged both by the rebels and by the citizens of Medina to accept the caliphate and finally did, but many who had been followers of Uthman refused to recognize the legitimacy of his reign.  In 661 at prayers during the annual fast of Ramadan, Ali was murdered.  He was succeeded by Muawiyah I who established the Umayyad dynasty.  These first five caliphs are considered to be the “rightly guided” caliphs.  Ali had a son, Hussein (or Husayn) who refused to pledge to the Umayyads as he considered their claim to the caliphate illegitimate.  Yazīd ibn Mu’āwiya ibn Abī Sufyān, the son of Muawiyah and second Umayyad caliph, had Hussein ambushed and killed at Karbala in modern Iraq.  He is considered a martyr by the Shiites and his memory is still a source of Shiite anger towards the Sunnis. 

The Umayyads ruled the caliphate from their capital at Damascus until overthrown by the Abbasids in 750.  The Abbasids moved the seat of the caliphate to Baghdad.  Survivors of the Umayyads fled to Muslim Spain where they eventually established a rival caliphate at Cordoba.  The Abbasids fell to the Mongols in 1258 and the caliphate eventually ended up being claimed by the Ottoman Sultans until their deposition following World War I. 

Over the centuries there have been a number of counter-caliphates claiming leadership in the Islamic world.  The Umayyads of Cordoba retained their caliphate until 1031 when it fractured into a number of warring Islamic kingdoms.  The Fatimid caliphate (909-1171) controlled most of North Africa from the Red Sea in the east to the Atlantic in the West.  They also reached up into Sicily for a period.  They were Shiite and their caliphs claimed descent from Mohammed through his daughter, Fatima, the wife of Ali.  The Sokoto Caliphate was a nineteenth century Islamic movement among Nigerian Muslims that eventually lost out politically to the power of European colonialism.  The Ahmadiyya Caliphate which claims over 20 million followers is a Messianic movement in Islam that claims its caliph, currently Mirza Masroor Ahmad, is the successor to the five righteous caliphs and a prophet.  It is considered heretical by mainstream Muslims who believe there is no prophet after Mohammed. 

When the Ottoman caliphate was deposed by Kemal Ataturk in 1924, there was a movement, especially among Muslims in the British Empire, to come together to chose a successor in a restored caliphate  In the end, however, the movement came to nothing. 

It would seem that this new caliphate proclaimed by Abu Bakr al Baghdadi is no more than another attempt to revive a long lost and impractical claim to empire, but this could be very different.  Islam is undergoing a real worldwide revival and many young Muslims are anxious to see their religion take its ancient place as a world-spanning empire.  The sort of religious fundamentalism represented by this movement is just the sort of thing that can energize people who feel that they have been discriminated against and marginalized for too long and are ready to break the political and religious hegemony that has kept them back.  Abu Bakr’s choice of a name (after the first caliph) and his talk of a caliphate, as well as his claim that while a Sunni he is in fact a descendent from Mohammed, could bring together both Sunni and Shiite factions in an attempt to restore Islam to the sort of power it had in the days of the “rightly-guided caliphs.”  Hitler’s dream of a restored Reich and the way it captured the imagination of the German people two generations ago show that a mystical psychopath can be as dangerous as any other cruel dictator.  Do not be surprised if this movement builds momentum in the Muslim world and becomes a major political and security threat to the West.  

Rogue Religion--Both in Christianity and in Islam

The restored Caliphate and its
Caliph Abu Bakr al Baghdadi 

Religion has great potential for good in the world; unfortunately it also has a great potential for evil.   The Dalai Lama has written that the purpose of religion is to cultivate such positive human qualities as tolerance, generosity, and compassion.  To this end religion has been the motivating factor in creating great works of art, music, and literature.  Even more impressively it has built massive health-care systems, institutions of learning, and movements for peace and reconciliation.  Religion has produced such people as Mother Teresa, Gandhi, Dr. Martin Luther King, Archbishop Tutu, the Dalai Lama, Jimmy Carter, Jacques Bunel, Damian of Molokai, Thich Nhat Hanh, Corrie ten Boom, Raoul Wallenberg, and Millard and Linda Fuller.  But there is a shadow side to religion as well which has led to pogroms and persecutions and inquisitions and wars. 

We now see this new phenomenon known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) under the leadership of the self-proclaimed caliph Abu-Bakr al Baghdadi.  The Iraqi division of Al-Qaeda proclaimed the Islamic State of Iraq in that part of Iraq where it had been able to drive out the Iraqi military and establish its authority over the local populace. Abu-Bakr al Baghdadi, the mullah of a small mosque, had risen to prominence in Iraq in great part because of his having been held by American forces for ten months in 2004.  He had a seat on the Mujahedeen  Shura Council,  the Sunni Islamic Council that directed the Iraqi insurgency.  In 2010 when Abu Omar al Baghdadi was killed in an American attack, abu-Bakr was selected to succeed him as the head of the insurgency quasi-State.

When in 2013 the Iraqi insurgency expanded into Syria in Syria’s ongoing civil war, Abu Bakr proclaimed the establishment of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.  But this was only the initial step of his dream—shared by many radical Muslims—of reestablishing the ancient Islamic Caliphate—a religious and political empire that in his heyday stretched from what is today Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Uzbekistan in the east through Armenia, Turkey Greece and the Balkans as well as Syria, Palestine (and modern Israel), the Arab peninsula, Iran and Iraq, along north Africa with Egypt, Morocco, Libya, Tunisia and up into Europe in Spain and Portugal to the Pyrenees.  To this end, two weeks ago Abu Bakr proclaimed himself Caliph.

Now there is not agreement in the Muslim world about Abu Bakr being Caliph any  more than there is agreement in the Christian world that Pope Francis is the Vicar of Christ.   I think he is; my Baptist neighbor likes Francis but doesn’t think he is the Vicar of Christ—in fact, doesn’t think that Christ has a vicar, or needs one.  We are both Christians, we just disagree on this point.  Well, ok, there are other points as well.  And the same is true in the Muslim world.  Islam is not a unified religion. In fact it is far less unified than Christianity.  But the dream of a restored Caliphate will capture the imagination of many young Muslims who feel that for these last six centuries or so their religion has not been respected and this is the chance to make its mark once again.  While this Abu Bakr fellow would seem to be another religious nut-case like David Allen Bawden, aka “Pope Michael,” a peculiar young man from Kansas who, along with his 30 “solid followers” believes he’s the true Pope, the self-selected Caliph needs to be taken far more seriously as he has the potential to bring together a significant portion of the Muslim world that has been moving more and more towards fundamentalism over the past twenty years. 

The Caliph is the successor of Mohammed.  From the very beginning there has been discord over the position with Shiite Muslims claiming that the caliphate must descend through the family of Mohammed while Sunni’s do not.  In a future posting we will look at the struggles in Islam that followed the death of Mohammed in 632 AD and the origins of the Sunni/Shia conflict.  Although himself a Sunni, Abu Bakr, now known officially as Amir al-Mu’minin  Caliph Ibrahim, in an effort to gain Shiite support as well as Sunni, claims descent from Al-Husayn ibn ‘Alî ibn Abî Tâlib, the grandson of Mohammed.  

I think when we remember that President George W. Bush said that God told him to invade Iraq we can see the danger that religion , in the wrong hands (and minds), can create.  I remember a few days before the second Iraq war began having dinner with friends.  Other guests at the table included a Christian Arab couple.  The wife is Syrian; the husband Egyptian.  Both are Catholics.  Although they are staunch Republicans, they emphatically said that this war would destabilize the entire Near East and bring great suffering on many, including and especially, the Christian population of these nations.  Truer words were not spoken.  Pope John Paul warned us very sternly not to go into this war and he was ignored.  The American bishops did nothing to make his message heard in this country.  Few clergy took up the Pope’s admonition. 

There was, I believe, a time when the situation in the Near East could have be defused by the United States insisting on a just solution to the Palestinian issue.  The Israel Lobby in this country made sure that did not happen and we have continued to give Israel a blank check to abuse its Arab population.  Muslims—and Christians—have seen their co-religionists have their centuries-old olive orchards uprooted, their homes bulldozed, their communities divided by “the Wall,” and their people terrorized  by the “settlers” and the Israeli soldiers who protect the thieves who rob the Palestinians of their fields, their shops, and their homes.  The injustices perpetrated on these people whose ancestors lived in that land when Joshua first led the Hebrew people across the Jordan into a “promised land”  have set the Arab world afire and that conflagration now threatens the whole world.  It is, I am afraid, far too late to douse the flames by correcting the injustices in Israel/Palestine.  Militant Islam is on the move.  Thank you to the Presidents Bush.  Thank you to Dick Cheney.  Thank you to Ronald Rumsfeld.   And thank you to the “Christianity” that enabled this disaster.