I
was struck last week when a politician said that even in the case of rape when
a child is conceived it is the will of God.
At first I thought: “how could anyone believe that?” Then I thought: “Wait, I believe that.” Then I had to sit back and ask myself: "what
do I believe about God?"
First,
we need to clarify what the politician said.
He did not say that the rape was the will of God. No one who is professes faith in the God of
Jesus could say that. There are certain
Old Testament stories that might lead one to believe that an act of violence
such as rape or murder could be God’s will but it would violate the image of
God as Abba, as a loving parent, that
Jesus presents in the Gospels. Such
Divinely ordained violence threatens to annul the paschal sacrifice of Christ which suffices to
atone for all the evil in the world and to cancel once and for all whatever
divine wrath is due to sin. So much for
the rape issue. What about God willing a
conception of life resulting from this act of violence? When this issue came up, I realized that I
had long believed that God directly willed the creation of each and every human
life at the time of its conception. But
after reflection it also dawned on me—in this context—that I have not for some
time believed that God has directly willed the creation of each and every human
life at the time of its conception. It
took a shock like hearing this jerk say something as outrageous as God has
willed the conception of a baby as the result of an act of violence for me to
realize that my thoughts about God and his role in our lives have indeed
changed over the years. Now, I am not
saying that God therefore gladly permits the termination of an innocent life
because of the circumstances in which it was conceived, but what I am saying is
that I have come to more clearly differentiate God the Creator of Life from
Santa in his workshop. The creation of
life is a biological process not an artisan craftsman at his skill. I don’t mean that God has a conveyer-belt
that piles up souls and shoots them into embryos like Pepsi being mass-squirted
into racked bottles passing through a machine.
To be honest, I am not sure exactly
what a “soul” is. I am not saying that I
don’t believe in souls, only that I don’t know what one is and how one is
joined to a biological product. I
haven’t gotten that far yet. And to be
honest, I probably won’t spend a lot of time figuring that one out. The important thing is that I realized I have
begun to seriously reconsider what I think about God, how I understand God, my
“concept” of God—my theology. And
obviously I am not alone.
This
is no surprise. We Christians have
redefined God at any number of points in our history. Indeed the People of Israel redefined God
periodically through their history before Jesus ever came along and gave us a
very new and very different notion of God than had been held by his co-religionists. Maybe we should look at some of these shifts
in our understanding of God. I am not
saying that God changes but rather that our human understanding of God has
changed throughout the history of our religious thought.
And
it is this shift in our basic understanding of the most important object of belief
that has so many Catholics frightened and the consequent polarization as some
in our faith have moved into brave and new experiences of God and others are
anxious to keep God in the same Box in which they found him in as
children. We are going to have to look
at this conflict.
From time to time, I find myself contemplating these issues. With my background in science and technology, my initial reaction to the rape comment a bit shocking. The biology is straight-forward, and so, like you I find myself in a bit of a conflict. I often wonder at those who so confidently assert their "knowledge" regarding the nature of the soul and how it attaches to the biological being. To me, these ideas are so far beyond our ability to comprehend that we must treat them with humility and acknowledge that anything we think we might "know" is probably just a poor impression of the reality. We should be open to new and better understandings.
ReplyDeleteI think that a series that looks at how our understanding of the nature of God has changed would be both interesting and useful. Your point that the current conflict might be the result of such a shift is intriguing, and one that hadn't really occurred to me before.